Individual
Go to List of Family Names Go to List of People < Previous Next >
RICHARDS William Theodore
Birth: 24 Mar 1900 Mass.
Death: 30 Jan 1940 New York, N.Y.
Cause of Death: suicide
Notes
1981 book:
William was a professor of architecture at Princeton Univ. Unmarried
studied chemistry under his father
1900 in Cambridge, Mass.
1910 in Cambridge, Mass.
1920 in Cambridge, Mass.
1930 in Princeton, N.J. boarder, university professor
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theodore_William_Richards
http://www.simonsays.com/content/book.cfm?tab=18&pid=411728&agid=2
from Tuxedo Park:
Chapter 1: The Patron
Ward was smiling but that did not mean that he was amused. The smile was a velvet
glove covering his iron determination to get under way without any lost motion.
-- WR, from Brain Waves and Death
On January 30, 1940, shortly after ten P.M., the superintendent of the building at 116
East 83rd Street noticed that a bottle of milk delivered that morning to one of his
tenants had remained in front of the door all day. The young man who rented the
three-room apartment had not said anything about going out of town. He was a
conspicuous fellow, extremely tall -- at least six feet four -- and lean, with piercing
blue eyes and a shock of dark hair. After knocking repeatedly and failing to get an
answer, the superintendent notified the police.
William T. Richards was found dead in the bathtub with his wrists slashed, blood from
his wounds garlanding the walls of the bathroom. He was dressed in his pajamas, his
head resting on a pillow. A razor blade lay by his hand. He was a former chemistry
professor at Princeton University who was currently employed as a consultant at the
Loomis Laboratory in Tuxedo Park, New York. He was thirty-nine years old. His
personal papers mentioned a mother, Miriam Stuart Richards, living in Massachusetts,
and the detective at the scene asked the Cambridge police to contact her. As The
New York Times reported the following morning, William Richards was from a
prominent Boston family, son of the late professor Theodore William Richards of
Harvard, winner of a Nobel Prize in chemistry, and the brother of the former Grace
(Patty) Thayer Richards, wife of the president of Harvard, James B. Conant.
Although his death was clearly a suicide, everything possible was done to hush up the
more unpleasant aspects of the event, and the Boston papers never published the
details. Richards' brother, Thayer, was immediately dispatched to New York, and he
saw to it that most of what had transpired was concealed from his mother and sister. A
suicide note that was found by the tub was destroyed, and its contents were never
revealed. The Richards family was naturally concerned about its reputation, but there
were also pressing concerns, of a rather delicate nature, that made it vitally important
that Bill's suicide be kept as quiet as possible. Miriam Richards, desperate to avoid
any scandal, drafted a reassuring letter attempting to put the untimely death of her son
in a better light, copies of which she sent out to important friends and relations. She
explained that Bill had long been "nervously, seriously ill" and had never properly
recovered from severe abdominal surgery several years earlier. She also supplied him
with an end that left open the possibility that his death was accidental, writing that
"Bill died of an overdose of a sleeping draught." It is entirely possible that this is what
she had been told.
"William Theodore Richards was beyond any doubt one of the most brilliant members
of our class," began his Harvard obituary, based on the fond reminiscences of his
friends and scientific colleagues. He was interested in new scientific phenomena, the
originality of his ideas leading him into experimental work. But he had the kind of
restless, wide-ranging intelligence -- he was a talented painter and musician and
briefly considered playing the cello professionally -- that made him, according to one
friend, "a veritable Renaissance man." He was a chemist at his father's insistence,
but his heart was not in it, and he found it difficult to force himself to undertake the
routine proofs and laborious accumulation of data that would have given him more
publishable material and more recognition in his field. He had "a mentality which could
be called great," wrote his classmate Leopold Mannes, a fellow scientist and
musician, who speculated that Richards despaired of ever meeting the onerous
demands he imposed on himself. "In his attitude towards life, towards science,
towards music -- of which he had an astounding knowledge and perception -- and
towards literature, he was a relentless perfectionist, and thus his own implacable
judge. No human being could be expected fully to satisfy such standards."
Richards was a solitary man, confining his friends to a small, clever circle. He kept
most of his contemporaries at bay with his caustic wit, which made quick work of any
human frailty, whether at his own expense or someone else's. With complete abandon,
he would ruthlessly mimic anyone from Adolf Hitler to some sentimental woman who
had been foolish enough to confide in him. To most, he seemed cordial, cold, and a
bit superior, his moodiness exacerbated by periods of poor health and depression. He
eventually quit his job at Princeton and moved to New York, where he worked part-
time as a chemical consultant while devoting himself to an arduous course of
psychotherapy. The Harvard memorial notes concluded that "after a brave struggle for
ten years to overcome a serious neurosis, which in spite of treatment grew worse, Bill
died by his own hand."
Richards' death was nevertheless "shocking" to Jim Conant and his wife, Patty.
Richards had celebrated Christmas with them only a few weeks before and had stayed
in the large brick mansion at 17 Quincy Street that was the official residence of the
Harvard president. Although his psychological condition had always been precarious,
he had seemed "to be making real progress," his mother later lamented in a letter to a
close family friend, so much so that "last summer and autumn he was so happy and
well that for fun he wrote a detective story." Richards had submitted the manuscript to
Scribner's, which "had at once accepted it."
Just a few weeks after he took his own life, his book, Brain Waves and Death, was
published under the pseudonym "Willard Rich." It was, in most respects, a
conventional murder mystery, with the added interest of being set in a sophisticated
modern laboratory, where a group of eminent scientists are hard at work on an
experiment designed to measure the electrical impulses sent out by the brain. In a
twist on the standard "hermetically sealed room" problem, Richards staged the murder
in a locked experimental chamber that is constantly monitored by highly sensitive
listening devices and a camera. The book earned respectful reviews, with The New
York Times describing the story as "ingeniously contrived and executed" and
awarding Willard Rich "an honorable place in the ranks of mystery mongers." None of
the critics were apparently aware that the author was already dead or that he had
rather morbidly foreshadowed his imminent demise in the book, in which the first victim
is a tall, arrogant young chemist named Bill Roberts.
At the time, only a small group of elite scientists could have known that while the
method Richards devised to kill off his literary alter ego was of his own invention -- a
lethal packet of poison gas that was frozen solid and released into the atmosphere
when warmed to room temperature -- the actual science and the laboratory itself were
real. George Kistiakowsky, a Harvard chemistry professor and one of Richards' closest
friends and professional colleagues, guessed the truth immediately, "that it was a
take-off on the Loomis Laboratory and the characters frequenting it." Despite its
contrived plot, the book was essentially a roman ? clef. No one who had ever been
there could fail to recognize that the "Howard M. Ward Laboratory" was in reality the
Loomis Laboratory in Tuxedo Park and that the charismatic figure of Ward himself was
transparently based on Alfred Lee Loomis, the immensely wealthy Wall Street tycoon
and amateur physicist who, among his myriad inventions, claimed a patent for the
electroencephalograph, a device that measured brain waves.
The opening paragraphs of the book perfectly captured Loomis' rarefied world, where
scientists mingled with polite society and where intellectual problems in astronomy,
biology, psychiatry, or physics could be discussed and pursued in a genteel and
collegial atmosphere:
The Howard M. Ward Laboratory was not one of those hospital-like institutions where
Pure Science is hounded grimly and humorlessly as if it were a venomous reptile; the
grounds of the Laboratory included a tennis court, bridle paths, and a nine-hole golf
course. Guests there did not have to confine themselves to science, they could live
fully and graciously.
It was Richards who had first told Kistiakowsky about Loomis' private scientific
playground in Tuxedo Park, a guarded enclave of money and privilege nestled in the
foothills of the Ramapo Mountains. Tuxedo Park, forty miles northwest of New York
City, had originally been developed in 1886 by Pierre Lorillard, the tobacco magnate,
as a private lakefront resort where his wealthy friends could summer every year. The
rustic retreat became the prime meeting ground of American society, what Ward
McCallister famously called "the Four Hundred," where wealthy moguls communed with
nature in forty-room "cottages" with the required ten bedrooms, gardens, stables, and
housing for the small army of servants required for entertaining in style. Leading
members of the financial elite, such as Rockefellers and Morgans, numbered among its
residents, as did Averell Harriman, who occupied a vast neighboring estate known as
Arden. Over the years, Tuxedo Park, with its exclusive clubhouse and fabled balls,
had taken on all of the luster and lore of a royal court, and although it had dimmed
somewhat since the First World War, it still regarded itself as the Versailles of the New
York rich.
Loomis, a prominent banker and socialite, was very much part of that world and owned
several homes there. According to Richards, however, Loomis was also somewhat
eccentric and disdained the glamorous swirl around him. He had developed a passion
for science and for some time had been leading a sort of double life: as a partner in
Bonbright & Co., the thriving bond investments subsidiary of J. P. Morgan, he had
amassed a substantial fortune, which allowed him to act as a patron somewhat in the
manner of the great nineteenth-century British scientists such as Charles Darwin and
Lord Rayleigh. To that end, Loomis had purchased an enormous stone mansion in
Tuxedo, known as the Tower House, and turned it into a private laboratory where he
could give free rein to his avocation -- primarily physics, but also chemistry,
astronomy, and other ventures. He entertained lavishly at Tower House and invited
eminent scientists to spend long weekends and holidays as his guests. More to the
point, as Richards told Kistiakowsky, Loomis also extended his hospitality to
"impecunious" young scientists, offering them stipends so they could enjoy elegant
living conditions while laboring as skilled researchers in his laboratory.
Richards had seen to it that Kistiakowsky -- "Kisty" to his pals -- secured a generous
grant from the Loomis Laboratory. The two had met and become fast friends at
Princeton in the fall of 1926, when as new chemistry teachers they were assigned to
share the same ground-floor laboratory. They were both tall, physically imposing men,
with the same contradictory mixture of witty raconteur and reserved, introspective
scientist. In no time they had discovered a mutual fondness for late night
philosophizing and bathtub gin. As this was during Prohibition, the Chemistry
Department had to sponsor its own drinking parties, and the two chemists "doctored"
their own mixture of bootleg alcohol and ginger ale with varying degrees of success.
Richards, who was subsidized by his well-heeled Brahmin family, had soon noticed
that his Russian colleague, a recent ?migr? who sent money to his family in Europe,
was having difficulty managing on the standard instructor's salary of $160 a month.
Knowing any extra source of funds would be welcome, Richards had put in a good
word with Loomis, just as he had when recommending Kistiakowsky to his "uncle
Lawrence" -- A. Lawrence Lowell, who was then president of Harvard, and Bill's uncle
on his mother's side. Grinning into the phone, he had provided assurances that
Kistiakowsky was not some "wild and woolly Russian" and, despite being just off the
boat, was "wholly a gentleman, had proper appearance and table manners, etc."
Richards' own introduction to Loomis had happened quite by accident a few months
prior to his arrival at Princeton. While Richards was completing his postdoctoral
studies at G?ttingen, he had been sitting in the park one Sunday morning, idly reading
Chemical Abstracts, when a paragraph briefly describing an experiment being carried
on in the "Loomis Laboratory" had caught his eye. He had immediately sent off a letter
to the laboratory, "suggesting that certain aspects of the experiment could be further
developed," and he had even outlined what the result of this development would
probably be. Some months later, he received a response from the laboratory informing
him that they had carried out his suggestions and the results were those he had
anticipated. This had been followed by a formal invitation to work at the Loomis
Laboratory.
Over the years, Richards and Kistiakowky had often commuted from Princeton to
Tuxedo Park together on weekends and holidays and had conducted some of their
research experiments jointly. Richards had arranged for them both to spend the
summer of 1930 as research fellows at the Loomis Laboratory. What a grand time that
had been. Not only was the room and board better than that of any resort hotel, but
weekend recreation at Tower House -- when the restriction against women was
relaxed -- included festive picnics, drinks, parties, and elaborate black-tie dinners.
Back then, they had both been ambitious young chemists at the beginning of their
careers and had reveled in the chance to work with such legendary figures as R. W.
Wood, the brilliant American experimental physicist from Johns Hopkins, whom Loomis
had lured to Tuxedo Park as director of his laboratory. Working alongside Loomis and
a long list of distinguished collaborators, they had carried out series of original
experiments, including some of the first with intense ultrasonic radiation, and had
proudly seen their lines of investigation published in scientific journals and taken up
by laboratories in America and Europe.
Kistiakowsky, who by then had joined Harvard's Chemistry Department and become
close friends with Conant, never publicly revealed that Richards' book was based on
Loomis and the brain wave experiments conducted at Tower House. In his carefully
composed entry in Richards' Harvard obituary, he made only a passing reference to a
"Mr. A. L. Loomis of Tuxedo Park," diplomatically noting that Richards' work at the
laboratory had afforded him "one of the keenest scientific pleasures of his career."
However, it is typical that he could not resist dropping one hint. Observing that very
few physical chemists possessed his late friend's keenness of mind, Kistiakowsky
concluded that no one could ever match Richards' own concise presentation of his
work, "which was always done in the best literary form."
At the time of Richards' death, Kistiakowsky was still working for Loomis on the side.
But the stakes were much higher now, and the project he had undertaken was so
secret, and of such fearful importance, that Richards' parody of the Loomis Laboratory
must have struck him as a wildly precipitous and ill-conceived prank. Richards had
always thumbed his nose at authority and convention and had been disdainful of the
narrow scope of his scientific colleagues, whom he once complained talked about
"nothing but the facts, the fundamental tone of life, while I prefer the inferred third
harmonic." But for Kistiakowsky, a White Russian who at age seventeen had battled
the advancing Germans at the tail end of World War I, and then fought the Bolsheviks
before being wounded and forced to flee his country, the prospect of another
European war took precedence over everything. While in the past he might have
joined Richards in poking fun at Loomis and his collector's attitude toward scientists,
Kistiakowsky now appreciated him as a man who knew how to get things done. Loomis
was a bit stiff, with the bearing of a four-star general in civilian clothes, but he was
strong and decisive.
Kistiakowsky did not have to be told to be discreet, though he may have been. Loomis
was furious about the book and threatened to sue for libel. He was an intensely
private man and was horrified at the breach of trust from such an old friend. Richards
had been a regular at the Tower House for more than ten years and was intimately
acquainted with the goings-on there. In the months directly preceding his suicide,
Loomis had plunged the laboratory into highly sensitive war-related research projects.
Loomis wanted no part of the gossip and notoriety that might result either from
Richards' unfortunate death or his book.
Neither did Jim Conant, who regarded the book as a source of acute embarrassment.
It was bad enough that his wife's family continuously vexed him with their financial
excesses and emotional crises, here was his brother-in-law stirring up trouble from the
grave with this incriminating tale. Patty Conant was so distressed that she begged her
brother, Thayer, to have the book recalled at once. But it was too late for that, and it
was not long before Conant discovered that Brain Waves and Death was not
Richards' only legacy.
With his instinctive ability to home in on the latest developments on the frontiers of
research, Richards had followed up his first book with something far more sensational.
Among the papers collected from his apartment after his death was the draft of a short
story entitled "The Uranium Bomb." It was written once again under the pseudonym
Willard Rich. The slim typed manuscript, bearing the name and address of his literary
agent, Madeleine Boyd, on the front cover, was clearly intended for publication.
Richards was an avid reader of Astounding Science Fiction and probably intended to
place his story in the magazine, which regularly carried the futuristic visions of H. G.
Wells and was a popular venue for the doomsday fantasies of scientists who were
themselves good writers. Richards' story opens with the meeting in March 1939
between a rather callow young chemist named Perkins (Richards) and a Russian
physicist named Boris Zmenov, who tries to enlist the well-connected American to
warn his influential friends, and ultimately the president, "to suppress a threat to
humanity." The Zmenov character, who is convinced the Nazis want to build a bomb,
explains that there had been a breakthrough in atomic fission: the uranium nucleus
had been split up, with the liberation of fifty million times as much energy as could be
obtained from any other explosive. "A ton of uranium would make a bomb which could
blow the end off Manhattan island."
Richards outlined Zmenov's theory, "tossed off with the breezy impudence of a
theoretical physicist," describing the principles of atomic fission and the chain
reaction by which an explosion spreads from a few atoms to a large mass of material,
thereby generating a colossal amount of power. When Perkins professes disbelief,
Zmenov becomes furious: "I am on the verge of developing a weapon," he declares,
"which will be the greatest military discovery of all time. It will revolutionize war, and
make the nation possessing it supreme. I wish that the United States should be this
nation, but am I encouraged? Am I assisted with the most meager financial support?
Bah."
As Conant read the manuscript, he realized it was an accurate representation of the
facts as far as they were known. While not exactly common knowledge, Conant was
aware that a great deal of information about uranium had been leaking out in scientific
conferences and journals over the past year. His brother-in-law could have easily
picked up many of his ideas just from reading The New York Times, which had
extensively covered the lecture appearances of the Danish physicist Niels Bohr and
his outspoken remarks about the destructive potential for fission. Even Newsweek had
reported that atomic energy might create "an explosion that would make the forces of
TNT or high-power bombs seem like firecrackers." For his part, Conant, an
accomplished scientist who had been chairman of Harvard's Chemistry Department
before becoming president of the university, was far from convinced atomic fission
was anywhere near to being used as a military weapon. He was still inclined to believe
the only imminent danger from fission was to some university laboratories. But he was
not ready to dismiss it, either.
Richards' story was disturbing, and if it cut as close to the bone as his novel had, it
was potentially dangerous. There were too many familiar names for comfort, including
an acquaintance "prominent in education circles" by the name of "Jim," which Conant
must have read as a sly reference to himself. More troubling still, the physical
description of Zmenov -- very short, round, and excitable -- matched that of the
Hungarian refugee scientist Leo Szilard, who was known to be experimenting with
uranium fission at Columbia University in New York. Szilard was always agitating within
the scientific community about the importance of fission and had even formed his own
association to solicit funds for his work. In a scene that rang especially true, Perkins
arranges for Zmenov to meet a wealthy banker, and Zmenov is crestfallen when he
does not pull out his checkbook. "Perhaps Zmenov thought all bankers were crazy to
find something to sling their money into," Richards wrote in yet another thinly
disguised account of Loomis' exploits. This time, Harvard's cautious president did not
wait for Loomis to tell him that the story revealed too great a knowledge of high-level
developments in the scientific world, and at the very moment external pressures were
coming to a peak. Conant made sure the story was suppressed.
Conant was too guarded to ever fully confide his doubts in anyone, but he expressed
some of his reservations to his son, Ted, who was thirteen years old at the time. The
boy had come across the story when going through the boxes of books and radio
equipment Richards had left to him and insisted that it ought to be published
according to the wishes of his beloved uncle. Anything short of that, he argued, "was
censorship." The fierce row between father and son that followed was memorable
because it was so rare. Conant was a calm, controlled man who rarely lost his temper.
He was also coldly practical and not given to old-fashioned sentiment. His angry retort
that Richards' story was "outlandish" and "unworthy of him," coupled with his
uncharacteristic claim that "the family honor was at stake," suggested there was
something more to his opposition than he was letting on. His son reluctantly let the
matter drop.
By the time Conant discovered Richards' manuscript, many of the events described in
the story, although slightly distorted, had in fact already transpired. Szilard had
befriended Richards and was regularly updating him on the work he was carrying on
with the Italian ?migr? physicist Enrico Fermi, who had won a Nobel Prize and had
recently joined the staff of Columbia University. After the French physicist Fr?d?ric
Joliot-Curie published his findings on uranium fission, Fermi lost patience with Szilard's
passion for secrecy and insisted that their recent experiments be published. In a hasty
note to Richards on April 18, 1939, Szilard broke the news:
Dear Richards: --
It has now been decided to let the papers come out in the next issue of Physical
Review, and I wanted you to be informed of this fact.
With kind regards,
yours,
[Leo Szilard]
As Richards cynically noted in his story, Szilard's interest in him was primarily as a link
to private investors like Loomis, whom Szilard desperately wanted to bankroll the
costly experiments he planned to do at Columbia University. At the same time, Szilard
had been busy wooing other Wall Street investors, enticing them with the promise of
cheap energy. In a letter to Lewis L. Strauss, a New York businessman interested in
the atom's commercial potential, Szilard wrote tantalizingly of "a very sensational new
development in nuclear physics" and predicted that fission "might make it possible to
produce power by means of nuclear energy." At one point, Szilard arranged for himself
and Fermi to have drinks at Strauss' apartment and asked Strauss to invite his wealthy
acquaintance Lord Rothschild, but the two physicists could not persuade the English
financier to underwrite their chain reaction research. Part of the problem was that
while Szilard needed backers, he was desperately afraid Germany would realize
fission's military potential first. He was obsessed with secrecy. He was determined to
protect his discoveries and cloaked his project in so much mystery that he often
appeared as "paranoid" as Richards portrayed him in his sharp caricature. After all his
efforts to find private investors had met with failure, Szilard wrote to Richards on July
9, 1939, pleading for money to prove "once and for all if a chain reaction can be
made to work." His tone was urgent:
Dear Richards:
I tried to reach you at your home over the telephone, but you seemed to be away, and
so I am sending this letter in the hope that it might be forwarded to you. You can best
see the present state of affairs concerning our problem from a letter which I wrote to
Mr. Strauss on July 3rd, a copy of which I am enclosing for your information and the
information of your friends. Not until three days ago did I reach the conclusion that a
large scale experiment ought to be started immediately and would have a good chance
of success if we used about $35,000 worth of material, about half this sum
representing uranium and the rest other ingredients...I am rather anxious to push this
experiment as fast as possible...I would, of course, like to know whether there is a
chance of getting outside funds if this is necessary to speed up the experiment, and if
you have any opinion on the subject, please let me know.
If you think a discussion of the matter would be of interest I shall of course be very
pleased to take part in it...Please let me know in any case where I can get hold of you
over the telephone and your postal address.
During the summer of 1939, Szilard and Fermi worked out the basis for the first
successful chain reaction in a series of letters. Encouraged by their correspondence,
but frustrated by his continued failure to enlist any financial support for his
experiments, Szilard turned to his old mentor, Albert Einstein, for help. Einstein was
sixty years old and famous, someone with enough stature to lend credibility to his
cause. After meeting with Szilard and reviewing his calculations, Einstein was quickly
persuaded that the government should be warned that an atomic bomb was a
possibility and that the Nazis could not be allowed to build such an unimaginably
powerful weapon. On August 2, Szilard drafted the final version of the letter Einstein
had agreed to send to the president. Szilard called a part-time stenographer at
Columbia named Janet Coatesworth and, speaking over the telephone in his thick
Hungarian accent, dictated the letter to "F. D. Roosevelt, president of the United
States," advising him that "extremely powerful bombs of a new type" could now be
constructed. By the time Szilard read her the signature, "Yours very truly, Albert
Einstein," he was fully aware that the young woman thought he was out of his mind.
That incident, no doubt exaggerated in Szilard's gleeful retelling, bears close
resemblance to a passage in Richards' story in which a young secretary comes to see
Perkins and confides her concerns about Zmenov. "I'm afraid he's getting himself into
the most dreadful trouble," she tells him. "You know how impetuous he is. He's a
genius, and when other people don't see that, he gets impatient."
Einstein's letter to Roosevelt would result in the convening of a government advisory
committee to study the problem. Roosevelt appointed Lyman J. Briggs, director of the
National Bureau of Standards, the government's bureaucratic physics laboratory, as
chairman. On October 21, 1939, Szilard went to Washington and reported to the first
meeting of the Briggs Advisory Committee on Uranium. He explained how his chain
reaction theory worked and put in his usual plea for funds to conduct a large-scale
experiment -- the same test he had been writing to Richards about for months. To
Szilard's astonishment, the committee agreed to give him $6,000 for his uranium
research.
Even then, Szilard did not cease his efforts at fund-raising and kept up his letters and
calls to promising prospects. Twelve days after the meeting in Washington, he sent a
brief note to Richards and included an eight-page memorandum for his "personal
information only," summing up his report to the Briggs committee. The memo laid out
exactly how much uranium and graphite he and Fermi would need for their
experiments, how much it would probably cost, and which companies could supply the
materials -- a blueprint for building a bomb. "It seems advisable we should talk about
these things in greater detail before you take up the matter with a third person..."
Szilard was never able to pin down the elusive Loomis, who a f
Parents
RICHARDS Theodore William (31 Jan 1868 - 2 Apr 1928)
THAYER Miriam Stuart (30 Jun 1866 - Sep 1957)
Siblings
RICHARDS Grace Thayer ("Patty") (1 Feb 1898 - 31 Oct 1985)
RICHARDS William Theodore (24 Mar 1900 - 30 Jan 1940)
RICHARDS Greenough Thayer (17 Oct 1905 - 24 Nov 1953)
Produced by Fzip 1.7 2/10/2021